Soil macronutrient cycles#

In the Virtual Ecosystem, as well as tracking the flow of carbon through the system, we also track the flow of nitrogen and phosphorus. The reason for tracking these two is that they are generally thought to be the two macronutrients that most limit ecosystem productivity. A significant portion of the cycling of these elements occurs associated with carbon. Beyond this organic macronutrient cycle, each element can also cycle independently of carbon. The processes involved in these inorganic nutrient cycles tend to be specific to the element of interest.

Organic macronutrient cycling#

The soil and litter model track the nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of each soil carbon pool. For the majority of processes, the nutrients are assumed to just follow the flow of carbon, e.g. when microbes die creating microbial necromass amount of nutrient added to the necromass pool is calculated as

\[d_n = \frac{d_c}{r_{N,m}},\]

where \(d_c\) is the amount of necromass generated in carbon terms and \(r_{N,m}\) is the carbon:nitrogen ratio of the microbial group. There are two processes that do not follow this pattern: litter decomposition and microbial uptake.

Litter decomposition occurs through two pathways, fragmentation and leaching. Fragmentation results in large pieces of litter being broken up into smaller and smaller pieces until they are no longer recognisable as litter. Crucially these fragments are still organic molecules, so here the nutrient flow still follows the carbon flow. Leaching occurs when water travelling downwards through the litter layer into the soil proper carries small molecules with it. As these molecules are very small, they can be either organic or inorganic, and so the nutrients can escape the organic cycle. For example, the organic phosphorus gets added to the labile (inorganic) phosphorus pool due to litter decay with rate

\[I_{l} = (1 - \delta_o) * \lambda_l * I_p,\]

where \(I_p\) is the total input of phosphorus from the litter to the soil, \(\lambda_p\) is the fraction of the litter decay that occurs by leaching, and \(\delta_o\) is the fraction of the leached phosphorus that enters the soil in an organic form.

Microbes uptake organic matter (in the form of LMWC) so that they can synthesis new biomass. This organic matter also has nitrogen and phosphorus components. This can result in more macronutrient being taken up than the microbe needs to sustain it’s growth. When this happens the excess macronutrient gets returned to the soil. The form that this excess nutrient gets returned in depends on how carbon limited the microbial group is. The closer to carbon limitation (the point where carbon is the nutrient limiting growth) the microbial group is the higher the proportion that gets returned in an inorganic form is.

Inorganic nitrogen cycling#

A substantial part of the nitrogen cycle occurs via inorganic forms of nitrogen, particularly in tropical soils. For this reason the model defines a number of inorganic nitrogen pools, as well as including a number of processes that specifically affect these inorganic nitrogen pools.

Inorganic nitrogen pools#

Ammonium (\(\ce{NH^{+}_{4}}\))#

Nitrogen fixation generally produces ammonia (\(\ce{NH_{3}}\)), whereas ammonium (\(\ce{NH_{4}^{+}}\)) is generally produced during organic matter decomposition. Transformation of ammonia to ammonium (and vice versa) is a frequent occurrence in soils, but the process would be tricky to parametrise and validate. So, for the sake of simplicity, we just track ammonium, under the assumption that ammonia and ammonium exist in constant proportion. As well as the processes already mentioned ammonium can also be generated by leaching from litter. This pool can be taken up by both plants and microbes, and can be removed from the soil by water flows.

Nitrate (\(\ce{NO^{-}_{3}}\))#

Nitrification results in production of nitrate (\(\ce{NO^{-}_{3}}\)) from ammonium. This nitrate can be lost due to leaching and volatilisation, or can be taken up by plant roots. Nitrate can also be mineralised from POM by microbes and can leach into the soil from the litter layer. This pool can be taken up by both plants and microbes, and can be removed from the soil by water flows.

Inorganic nitrogen cycling processes#

There are a number of processes specific to the inorganic nitrogen pools. A couple of these are very simple. Firstly, ammonia added to the system at a fixed rate to represented environment deposition. Secondly, ammonia volatilises out of the soil at rate proportional to its concentration in the soil. The other processes are more complex and are explained in detail below.

Nitrogen fixation#

Our model of nitrogen fixation makes two major simplifications. Firstly, as already mentioned we assume that all nitrogen is fixed in the form of ammonium. Secondly, we do not explicitly represent nitrogen-fixing bacteria as a separate microbial group, instead we use empirical relations to capture the rate of nitrogen fixation. We do, however, calculate nitrogen fixation by plant associated bacteria and the nitrogen fixed by free-living microbes separately. To calculate the rate of nitrogen fixation by plant symbiotes we use the following expression

\[N_{s}(T) = \frac{S_{p}}{C_{f}(T)},\]

where \(S_{p}\) is the rate of carbon supply from the plants to their symbiotic partners, and \(C_{f}(T)\) is the cost of nitrogen fixation at temperature \(T\). This fixation cost is the amount of carbon needed to fix a unit amount of nitrogen. To calculate this we use the following empirical expression (adapted from (Brzostek et al., 2014))

\[\begin{split} \begin{align} C_{f}(T) &= \infty \quad T<0, \\ C_{f}(T) &= C_0 + C_{\infty} * (e^{s * T * (1 - (T / T_e))} - 1) \quad T>=0, \end{align} \end{split}\]

where \(C_0\) is the cost at zero Celsius, \(C_{\infty}\) is the maximum additional cost at high temperatures (this is asymptotically approached as temperatures tend towards infinity), \(s\) is the sensitivity of the cost to changes in temperature and \(T_e\) is the (positive) temperature at which the fixation cost is equal to the cost at zero degrees Celsius.

The rate of nitrogen fixation by free-living microbes is simpler to calculate as we assume that it is only effected by temperature (because there isn’t a symbiotic partner). We calculate the fixation rate using the following expression (adapted from (Lin et al., 2000))

\[N_{f}(T) = f_r * Q_f^{(T - T_r) / 10.0},\]

where \(f_r\) is the rate at which free-living microbes fix nitrogen (per unit volume of topsoil) at the reference temperature \(T_r\) and \(Q_f\) is the \(Q_10\) coefficient for nitrogen fixation.

Nitrification#

Nitrification is the process by which nitrate is formed from ammonium in the soil. To calculate this rate we adapted an empirical relationship used in (Fatichi et al., 2019), which makes the assumption that nitrification rate obeys linear kinetics with variations due to changes in soil temperature and soil moisture. The nitrification rate is calculated at follows

\[r_n = k_n * f_{T,n} * f_{w,n} * \ce{NH_{4}^{+}},\]

where \(k_n\) is the rate constant for nitrification, \(f_{T,n}\) is a factor capturing the impact of soil temperature on nitrification rate, \(f_{w,n}\) is a factor capturing the impact of soil moisture on nitrification rate and \(\ce{NH_{4}^{+}}\) is the concentration of ammonium in the soil.

Denitrification#

Denitrification is the process by which nitrate is converted into nitrite. This nitrite is generally rapidly lost to the soil quickly (in a variety of forms) so we don’t track it directly. To calculate the rate at which denitrification occurs we adapted an empirical relationship used in (Fatichi et al., 2019), which makes the assumption that denitrification rate obeys linear kinetics with variations due to changes in soil temperature and soil moisture. The denitrification rate is calculated at follows

\[r_d = k_d * f_{T,d} * f_{w,d} * \ce{NO_{3}^{-}},\]

where \(k_d\) is the rate constant for denitrification, \(f_{T,d}\) is a factor capturing the impact of soil temperature on denitrification rate, \(f_{w,d}\) is a factor capturing the impact of soil moisture on denitrification rate and \(\ce{NO_{3}^{-}}\) is the concentration of nitrate in the soil.

Inorganic phosphorus cycling#

Similarly, inorganic forms of phosphorus play an important role in the total phosphorus cycle. The soil model therefore defines a set of key inorganic phosphorus pools, along with processes that specifically effect those pools.

Inorganic phosphorus pools#

Primary mineral P#

Phosphorus can enter soils through weathering of primary minerals. Though this contribution to the overall phosphorus budget is likely to be small in our case, we include it for the sake of model completeness.

Labile P#

The inorganic phosphorus that can be taken up by plants and microbes is termed labile phosphorus. This type of phosphorus is formed either by breakdown of organic matter, by weathering of primary mineral phosphorus, or the breakdown of secondary mineral phosphorus. This pool can be taken up by both plants and microbes, and can be removed from the soil by water flows.

Secondary mineral P#

Labile phosphorus can form associations with minerals that prevent uptake by plants. This is termed secondary mineral phosphorus. This phosphorus can be liberated from its mineral association as labile phosphorus.

Inorganic phosphorus cycling processes#

Inorganic phosphorus is added to the system in a couple of ways. Firstly, labile phosphorus added to the system at a fixed rate to represented environment deposition. Secondly, tectonic uplift adds new primary mineral phosphorus into the system, obviously this is a very slow process so the rate of tectonic uplift is set to zero by default. However, we keep this process in the model as it will be relevant both for long-duration model runs and if the model is applied to areas of greater tectonic activity.

The breakdown of primary mineral phosphorus into labile inorganic phosphorus is modelled as a linear decay by

\[b_P = k_P * P_P,\]

where \(k_P\) is rate constant for primary phosphorus breakdown and \(P_P\) is the density of primary mineral phosphorus in the soil. The sorption of labile inorganic phosphorus to soil minerals (forming secondary mineral phosphorus) and the breakdown of secondary mineral phosphorus (forming labile inorganic phosphorus) are both also assumed to follow linear kinetics. As such the net formation rate of secondary mineral phosphorus can be expressed as

\[f_S = k_L * P_L - k_S * P_S,\]

where \(k_L\) is the rate constant for sorption of labile inorganic phosphorus to soil minerals, \(P_L\) is the density of labile inorganic phosphorus in the soil, \(k_S\) is rate constant for secondary mineral phosphorus breakdown and \(P_S\) is the density of secondary mineral phosphorus in the soil.